Puppies?

It is official. Miss Ailsa is pregnant and I am nervous. She is pleased as "magic" happened last week - on confirming that she had puppies, her food amount went up from 2/3 c twice daily to 3/4 c.

That is one interesting lesson from the dogs: live in the present. They appear to have memory of good and bad - of actions that bring rewards and people who they do not like but they do not dwell in the past with gripes that they carry around with them and keep them up at night. Nor do they appear to worry about what will happen later today, tomorrow or next week. How delightful to take each moment in the moment. Every smell is new (not always ones I would like!) as is every action.

Right now Colin is visiting with his Mom, Kelcie, and he is parading through the living room with a toy he found in the dog room. To his delight, it has a hole in it already so he is festooning the living room with Kaypok. There is another toy (that I have not seen in months) that has been eviscerated and I see a minimum of seven (!) dead bones that have been carefully retrieved from the basket and brought out to the the living room.

His greatest desire is for his Mom, Kelcie & Ailsa to play but they are being contented snoozers on the sofa digesting breakfast (and cooking babies!). Now I need to bring out the MONSTER machine and clean up the decorations - much to his chagrin (the entertainment, though, is that everybody will be up and moving and he can BARK).

Ginger

What Rally can learn from Agility

[repost from The Pink Pin]

Rally was originally proposed as a mix between Obedience and Agility. But, most people will say, it really has almost nothing to do with agility. The only agility-like aspects of Rally are the numbered course and the fact that it's timed. Other than that, Rally is very firmly rooted in Obedience. The signs and their performance are all Obedience tasks.

Further, many Rally people have never done agility. They may be new to dog sport, or they may have done obedience or be taking obedience classes. But there is one fundamental way that Rally does relate to agility that many people simply don't think about.

In Obedience, a dog progresses from task to task, with a break in between. Heel on leash. Break. Figure 8. Break. Stand for exam. Break. Heel off leash. Break. Recall. In Obedience, the "between exercises" break time is when the handler can praise the dog, and the dog gets mental and physical time off, even if just for a few seconds. It can be a way to keep the dog relaxed. But it can also signal a mental disconnect, then the need to reconnect as the team moves on to the next segment.

In agility, there are no breaks. You start at the first jump and end at the last, and the rest of the course is a constant flow of multiple tasks. Even on the table, the dog is expected to hold attention and position. In agility, good handlers know to treat the course as a single piece. While novice agility handlers will occasionally handle each jump and obstacle separately, not thinking about the next thing down the line till they get there, that doesn't last long. You quickly learn in agility that if you are not planning two to three obstacles ahead you are not going to be setting an efficient line. And in agility there is certainly no time to stop and see what number you're on, figure out what you're supposed to do there, then do it. In agility, all of the obstacles are well known and trained ahead of time and the handler walks the course until he or she feels confident of what needs to happen to create an overall fluent, fast, efficient, smooth line.

The problem is, too many people treat Rally courses like Obedience with breaks. They heel to a sign, peer at it to make sure they know what it is, sort out the details in their head (reminding themselves that this is the call front with/without a halt, or the spiral with the dog INside), complete the sign, then heel to the next sign and do it all over again. They do not think ahead from one sign to the next, much less about how their speed and line exiting one sign may affect approach and performance of the next. They certainly don't think of the Rally course as a single unit, to be accomplished as one piece. As a result, we see a lot of slow, jerky, and/or hesitant performances. Doing Rally this way is handling piecemeal, and the score and time will reflect it.

In Rally, there are no breaks for praise. The team is supposed to start at the Start sign and keep going until the Finish sign. When you think of it that way, it becomes clear that Rally competitors need to walk and plan their Rally course as they would an agility course. Handling as a single line will produce a much smoother, faster run that is a lot more fun to do and to watch.

The first and perhaps most important thing is to know the Rally rules and signs before entering. Handlers should understand each sign at a glance and have the performance of each sign ingrained so they don't have to actually think about it, and can let their subconscious take over the task. This also means that the dog knows its job. Dog and handler confidence begets smoothness.

If you really know and understand the signs, then your walk through can be focused on pace and smoothness. Walk the course once to make sure you know where everything is and what follows what. Then walk the course with an eye to how the *next* sign affects your line on the sign you are currently performing. How will your exit from the call-front-finish-right carry you to the offset figure 8? How should you pace and angle your jump in order to have a smooth transition to that 270 right? Think ahead. What we learn in agility is that often, a mistake at a jump actually started three jumps prior with a poor cue or a bad line.

Finally, walk the course as many times you can as a complete flowing line. Concentrate on keeping your shoulders back and head up and striding out in a brisk, smooth pace. You have a destination. That destination is not the next sign, it's the finish line.

Like agility, Rally should be a dance between dog and handler moving as a cohesive whole throught the course. Walk and think of your Rally course as you would an agility course, and see how your performance improves.

Long time no speak

It is interesting how one can become silent when a goal is in sight. For me the goal has been to finish Jura's AKC championship. Some call the "CH" a beauty title, some call it certification to breed (as the dogs are supposed to be judged against their breed standards with the ultimate goal of judging fitness to breed - which is why the dogs must be reproductively intact) - in my case, more than anything else it was fulfillment of a promise.

First of all, Jura finished his CH in Santa Rosa California with me showing him to a British judge on August 20th. At a later date I will write about that experience (but I had to share the photo from the experience - that is GRASS that we are on - no wonder California can experience such nasty fires! It looks like a berber rug.)

Second let me go back to the promise.

Back in April of 2003 I travelled to Scotland to fetch a springer puppy from a breeder I had met some two years earlier.

Sometimes we have to wait for the things we want - Jura was worth waiting for!

At 10 weeks he was a ball of skin with huge paws, a beguiling face and loads of spots (ticking). And he looked REALLY different from the show springers in the US. Before I drove away with this "wee pup", the first of my breeders dogs to leave the country she asked me whether I was planning to show him in conformation. To be honest, the whole conformation world bothers me. The whys and wherefores can wait for a later time. I took one look at her face and I heard the tone in her voice and asked if it was something she wanted me to do (with a sinking feeling inside). She said, yes, that it would mean the world to her if the dog she was sharing with me and allowing to be taken so far from home were to be shown in the US and if he were to get his American Championship. I suspect I sighed audibly and I told her that she was giving me a tall order as the British bred Springers look very different from the Show Springers in the US and differences are not features that are favored in the dog world - that it would take finding judges who would judge the dog relative to the standard rather than relative to what they saw most often in the ring. I knew that my statements were not penetrating when I looked at her face. So I made the promise that I would show him and that I would try to finish his American CH.

Well his first show was as a puppy right before the English Springer Spaniel Specialty at Purina in September of 2003 and we were told that he looked like "an Import" (duh) and that I would never finish him. Uh Oh. Fighting words. His first point towards his CH did not come until December of 2005 when taken into the ring by a professional handler, Santiago Pinto. After periodically going on the road with Santiago, Jura "pointed out" by the end of 2007 (a dog must earn 15 points; of those wins at least 2 must be 3, 4, or 5 point "majors"; the number of dogs to be beaten to win 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 points is a function of the region in which the dog is shown and the history of breed entries in the past year). Santiago thought that Jura needed a better known handler to obtain his "majors" so Jura went on the road for 4 months with a well known Springer handler. The stay was short because it did not work out - they put weight on Jura trying to fill out that skin and all that happened was that he looked fat and different. I took him home, helped to get the weight off, recondition him and he forgave me for sending him away (thank goodness). We showed periodically but had trouble finding shows with sufficient entries to have a "major". Our first break came a year ago at the Kansas City Royal when Gloria Geringer gave us our first major (yea). You'd never know from the show photo that I was elated because I have a great frown on my face (concentration). Over the time hunting for those majors I had put the full 15 points on Jura without earning the CH. I saw that there was a set of shows in August in California that was slated to have 2 British, 1 Finnish, and 1 Australian judge. I thought OK, I will travel to CA and give it one last chance - he has his 15 points and I have given it my best, but it is time that Jura gets on with the rest of his life and performance career.

So August came, and my friend Patti, a repro vet from the Chicago area and co-owner of Jura's love child, Colin, and I loaded up 5 springers and drove to CA. It took 3 days on the way out - day 1 took us through KS and CO to Denver; Day 2 we went north to WY and crossed the salt flats of UT; Day 3 was NV down to CA. Colin showed first on the Thursday with Patti and he was the puppy through & through having a blast in the ring - maybe 3 steps with 4 paws on the ground but who cares! He got a blue ribbon :) Patti's tri-color Springer and Jura were in the open class and when we took first I found myself holding my breath. We stayed in the ring for winner's dog and I really only remember the judge pointing to us and while I knew it was that we had won, I dared not think positively! Even taking the picture did not make it sink in; nor did the next 3 days of shows.

Only when I was entering Jura in agility at the ESS National and going to the AKC website to get his registration number did I get the thing that made me smile: on his data page it said CH Berkenbar Bysanze RN NA NAJ. It was official. The results had been tallied and the second major was acknowledged. We had done it with a win under a British judge, Mr. Robert Jackson. I fulfilled my promise.

My breeder was indeed over the moon, she now has a dog of her breeding that has finished in the US. In fact, the unofficial count is that Jura is the 7th full import dog to finish his CH in the US - and more amazingly, I, a novice conformation person, was there at the end of the leash when he won his majors. When the show photo comes, I'll share (see above- kept another promise :) ).

In the meantime, Jura seems to know that his show career has wound down. We will show at the Springer Spaniel Specialty again at Purina on Saturday in the Best of Winners Class as a finished champion. We won't win, we will still look very different from the other show dogs, but he is still an English Springer Spaniel and a finished dog even though he "looks like an import" (duh).

Mandatory Spay Neuter. Is it a good idea?

A mandatory spay/neuter could force sterilization of dogs like my Zipper, Ch Regatta It's About Time, OA, AXJ, RS-O, JS-O, UAg1. Zipper is the #5 agility Min Pin in the country.

Columbia's Board of Health, along with the Central Missouri Humane Society, are contemplating passing an ordinance which would require all pets in Columbia to be spayed or neutered.

It sounds good on the surface. We have, according to CMHS and the , a pet overpopulation problem. We need to take care of that problem. If everyone would just spay/neuter, the problem would go away, right? No new dogs and cats being born would mean much less burden on Animal Control and CMHS. The sun would shine, and the birds would sing. All would be right in Columbia.

Or would it?

The first and most important question to ask when contemplating a new law is, will it work? Addendums to that question include, how would it be paid for, who, if anyone, would be harmed, who would benefit, and how would it affect the local economy?

Unfortunately, a mandatory spay/neuter law would not work, which is why similar moves by other municipalities all over the U.S. have failed. Why wouldn't it work? Oh let us count the ways.

First, its totally unenforceable. There is no way to ensure that every pet in Columbia is altered. Inspectors would have to go from house to house on a search. And if it's tied into licensing, that won't work either. People simply will not license their dogs. If people who don't want to spay/neuter know that if they go to the vet they'll be required to do so, they will not go to the vet. Thus more animals will become sick and not get treatment and even more will remain unaltered.

There's no way to pay for it. The costs for such a program would far outstrip any license fees gained, because, see above, compliance with licensing would falter. Of course draconian fees could be instituted for those who wish their animals to remain intact, but that too discourages participation. Even worse, it punishes responsible breeders and forces those of us who DO take care of our dogs to pay for the idiots who don't.

A moment to discuss responsible breeders. Responsible breeders are dog lovers who have a hobby, usually showing dogs and also occasionally breeding. Most breed very few litters (I've bred a whopping two litters since I got my first Doberman in 1981). No responsible breeder ever breeds for money. Responsible breeders have a deep passionate admiration for their breed or breeds, and when they do decide to whelp a litter it's always with the mandate of improving the gene pool of the breed as a whole. It's never, ever for money. Responsible breeders have long waiting lists for puppies. Responsible breeders do not have dogs that end up in shelters, because responsible breeders are willing to take back any dog they have produced, at any time, for any reason, no question asked. We want to know *exactly* what happens to each and every life we produce and we are dead serious about it.

Responsible breeders do genetic health tests on their dogs prior to breeding. They show their dogs to ensure they have correct temperament and structure. It's a hobby. And just like Golf or Fishing, you throw money at it. You rarely if ever get money back. Most responsible breeders are far from wealthy. Finally and perhaps most importantly, responsible breeders are just as concerned as anyone else about the problem of unwanted dogs, and a huge majority of them are involved in rescue in some way or another.

Okay, back to why this won't work. On top of not being enforceable and being very expensive you just can't legislate morality. The idiots down the road from me breeding their pit bulls every six months are not going to obey some law. They're going to keep breeding.

And let's talk economic impact. Columbia holds a large conformation dog show as well as several agility trials each year. Mandatory Spay/Neuter could force relocation of those events, which have a multi-million dollar impact on the Columbia economy. It would also hurt dog training businesses such as CCSC who train dogs for show as well as pet companions.

And the question is, what is the problem in Columbia? Is it truly that there are too many pets and too few homes? Or is it that irresponsible owners are not properly taking care of and training their pets? Is it that too many owners think of their pets as disposable commodities, to be discarded at the first hint of inconvenience? I don't have any numbers (and would be glad to see any) but I bet that the number of actual puppy litters turned in to CMHS is fairly small. I bet most dogs turned into CMHS are adolescents to old age. Which means they HAD A HOME. But that home dumped them. If that's true, then it's not that there are too few homes. It's that there are too few responsible homes. And mandatory spay/neuter, even if it worked, would not even begin to address that issue.

So what is the solution? I think it's three-fold.

First, the city should work together with the University of Missouri Veterinary Teaching Hospital to offer free spay/neuter clinics. Not low-cost, free. No questions asked. To pay for it, grants could be applied for and licensing fees could go up a moderate amount (perhaps $2 or $3).

Second, the city should use the internet and other dissemination that's free or very low cost to launch a publicity campaign to help inform the community and encourage participation.

Third, the city and CMHS should work proactively with training centers like CCSC to offer discounted training opportunities for people with pets. A dog that is trained is far less likely to be given up than a dog who is untrained. Many owners give up their dogs because they simply do not have the tools they need to deal with behaviors they don't want.

Positive proactive action will get results. Punitive laws with no teeth and no chance of effectiveness will not.

AKC to accept Mixed Breeds in 2010

The great news of the week is that starting in April 2010, the AKC will allow mixed breeds to participate in Agility, Obedience, and Rally. This is a tremendous opportunity for Mixed Breed owners and their dogs.

While there are a number of other organizations that allow mixes in agility, including UKC, USDAA, ASCA, NADAC, CPE, and DOCNA, not all of them are available locally. And even the ones who are seen locally are not numerous. In Columbia, each year we have one UKC trial, two ASCA trials and (starting this June) USDAA. You can find more opportunities in Kansas City and St. Louis, but still not that many per year, maybe a total of 10-15 trials for all those venues combined. In contrast, There are many AKC trials available. Not just the two in Columbia, but many in Kansas City, Lawrence Kansas, St. Louis, etc.

For owners of mixed breeds wishing to do Obedience or Rally, the change is even more striking. They will go from having perhaps one or two opportunities per year in a 100 miles radius to many.

AKC's new program will be a particular boon to our local 4H kids, many of whom have mixes. I'm super-excited about the new program and can't wait for it to start!

Do a demo for us!

My van, fully loaded. There are two Dobermans and a Min Pin under there, and you can't even see the other tunnel...

Now that it's out of the van, it looks a bit more organized.

Ginger takes a break in a lull between crowds.

Jura goes after a thrown toy as a reward.

Vegas, Mr. Suave and Persuasive. Do you have a treat for me? I am starving you know.

"Come do a demo for us" they say. "It's for a great cause, and you'll get a lot of exposure."

And they're right of course. It is always for a great cause, and it is super exposure for our training center. And we enjoy doing them. So we usually do at least two or three a year, and yet we also turn down several others each year. Why?

Because holy beejeebus, it's a crapload of work.

Today, we had a demo at the MU Veterinary Teaching Hospital Open House. We were set for three performances of 10-15 minutes each at 10:30, 11:30, and 12:30. For this Open House, we spent several hours copying brochures and locating our other paperwork (enrollment forms, business cards, the form for our new summer camp for kids, etc). Then we went to the training center last night and pulled two sets of 6 weave poles, 8 metal 4' solid-base jumps, two 15' tunnels, 8 tunnel weights, poles and bars, 20 sets of ring gates, feet to go on the ring gates so they'd stand up, the CCSC sign (digging frantically in the closet to find the darn thing), one of our exercise balls, rally signs and stands, cones, and chairs. I also made sure we had sun screen, paperclips and clipboards. For the dogs I had treats and their training bags, but that stays pretty prepped.

Then this morning we had to load it all. Two other people had already loaded the gates, rally stuff, and paperwork. I arrived at our building before 8:00 a.m. and loaded the two tunnels, weights, four of the metal jumps, all of the jump bars and both sets of weave poles. All on top of three dogs. I found I couldn't fit the rest of the metal jumps in, so instead went and pulled four more jumps, our freestanding wing jumps.

Off to breakfast, then we arrived at the site at 9:30. After some confusion about where we actually were supposed to be, we now had to unload everything and set up our rings. We started setting ring gates only to find that one Bachelor's Degree (me) and one PhD (Ginger) can't count for snot. We needed 26 sets of ring gates for the size rings we wanted, not 20. But having learned the hard way that at demos you always gate everything, we made our rings smaller instead of leaving gates out. If you don't gate everything, people try to drag their dogs through tunnels and over jumps willy-nilly, willing or not. Since we don't like to see dogs traumatized for life by well-meaning but naive owners, we gate. Today we also had to deal with high winds, so we ended up using tracking stakes from Steve and Jamie's van to help hold things down.

So after almost another hour of setup, we were finally ready for our first demo. And that's always the fun part. Talking to people, especially kids, about a sport I love to do, one that is accessible to all dogs of all sizes, shapes, and types, is great. The crowds were wonderful, the kids asked funny and perceptive questions. We were a bit shorthanded this demo, with Andrea in Omaha and Kathy in Wichita. Steve and Jamie had a dog, and I worked all three of mine, even 11 1/2 year old Viva. Ginger worked both her adult Springers and the 3 month old puppy had a great time with the crowd. Liz showed up with Standard Schnauzer Vegas and he demonstrated the exercise ball. We talked and explained until my voice was pretty much gone.

Our dogs were, I have to say, amazing. They worked the rings and the crowds, allowed innumerable hands to pet them and lots of chirping children's voices over their heads. Viva, the old Dobe, is a pro at this stuff, but Zipper the Min Pin is still young and I was just so thrilled with his attitude and patience. Ditto the Springers, the Weim Faith who was pretty much always mobbed, and Vegas too.

Finally we were finished with demos, but not at all finished with our day. We had vet student help to break things down, but we still had to repack the cars, then haul it all back to the building, take it all out and put it back. Even though our last show was at 12:30, it was almost 2:30 before I and the dogs finally arrived home. Where they promptly crashed into sound sleeps, exhausted by their day.

We do love to do demos, but now perhaps people may understand why we just don't do that many...

(originally posted at http://www.pinkpin.blogspot.com)

A New Venture at CCSC

Summer is coming (hard to believe on days like this!) and kids will be out of school and fancy free So, some of our instructors have agreed to organize a Kid's and K9s camp.

Your thoughts and suggestions would be welcome as we work out the details.  Here are the basics:

-1 week in length per session.

-Mornings (cooler temperature, more active dogs & kids)

-Several activities each day (craft/projects interspersed with basic training & play)

-Children entering 1st grade to 5th (?)

-Basically well behaved dogs (and kids!)

-Small groups of Children & dogs per instructor

Here are questions we are working on: what dates? Just before the summer session in the Columbia schools begins? Not in August?  Evening events geared toward kids, dogs & families?  Half day activities on weekends that are focussed on 1 or 2 things?

You may answer to this blog or to the CCSC website (www.columbiak9sportscenter.com )

Thanks,

Ginger

Oh Good grief, where does the time go?

You would think I would be incredibly rich if I had one penny for every good intention to get back to the CCSC blog - I won't add Kathy & Andrea's pennies!  WE could own the entire building by now.

Lets just say that like everyone else there has been too much going on with too little time.

What's new?  

Lots - lots of new classes and new activities over at the center and good people who have been writing stories about us in the local press - and some new ones to come - and

new dogs - --

Since I last got around to telling anybody anything, Jura became a Dad - he was a "back yard breeder" no less and sired a singleton B&W baby whom we have called "Colin".  Colin is now 12 weeks old and just passed the new AKC S.T.A.R. puppy class last week so like it or not, he is on his way.  His co-owner is a Veterinarian who also has springers (including Colin's Mum, Kelcie) who lives in the Chicago area and specializes in reproductive medicine - so bringing Colin into this world with Kelcie as a Mum was well within her area of expertise.

The picture you see of Colin is on the back of Jura - who has turned out to be a great Dad and Miss Ailsa has turned out to be a really good Auntie (and Governess - she lets no bad behaviors go by).

Orientation is on Wednesday evening at 6:30 and there are SATURDAY classes now!

More to come - I promise.

Ginger

Liz Hansen featured in Trib

It's Westminster weekend! That means dogs from all over the country head to Madison Square Garden, and I sit glued to the couch all night Monday and Tuesday night Feb 9 and 10.

Liz Hansen, a local who is attending, has been featured in the Columbia Tribune!

And don't forget the Show Me Canines UKC trial this weekend. Show Me will have obedience, rally, and agility. Come watch, or if you'd like to help contact Kathy.